I am rereading Elaine Pagels' book " Beyond Belief.". This morning I came to the portion where she's sharing some contrasts between the Gospel of John and the Gospel of Thomas.
John portrays Jesus as the only son of God, the only light that leads to God, Whereas Thomas portrays Jesus as embodying the light that leads us to discover God's light is within us all, because we are all made in the image of God.
Apparently Both gospels were written about the same time, near the end of the 1st century. But John's gospel fit the needs of organizing into what became a church. Thomas's ideas led more to individual spirituality. It is interesting That the powers that emerged in that time , declared Thomas's work heretical. Even though most of John's gospel was very different from Matthew, Mark, and Luke, it was included as an acceptable gospel, although debated for quite a while whether or not it should be included.
I find it very interesting that even though the Gospel of Thomas was banned, labeled heretical, and mostly destroyed, his ideas somehow seeped into the middle ages and the great mystics who were very much in alignment with the message of Thomas.
And then the twist of fate, in 1945 in Nag Hammmadi there was the Gospel of Thomas, as well as many others thought to be lost. The gospel of Thomas was, after centuries, available to read and study and contemplate.
At fiest, they were thought tp be Gnostic. However they are now not thought to be Gnostic , as they do not proclaim to have all secret truth .
I encourage you to read at least two of this find - The Gospel of Thomas and the Gospel of Truth. Enter the diversity of the first century. Imagine all of the points of view that were in abundance until someone, a group of someones, decided what was and what was not acceptable. It was according to a few men, who were far removed in time from the life of Jesus, that we now have this particular New Testament. interesting.